L'ALLEVAMENTO E' PASSIONE, LA SELEZIONE E' ARTE, solo la conoscenza e l'esperienza fanno i veri campioni
 
Pagina precedente | 1 2 | Pagina successiva

Blu curiosita

Ultimo Aggiornamento: 07/06/2010 18:42
Autore
Stampa | Notifica email    
05/05/2010 08:18
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Questo pulcino era blu nato ed ora diventato completamente bianco !!!???



[Modificato da Danny_57 05/05/2010 08:20]
05/05/2010 09:00
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 2.918
Registrato il: 30/08/2009
Città: CASTELNUOVO BORMIDA
Età: 39
Sesso: Maschile
Utente Veteran
è la stessa cosa che mi sta succedendo con un pulcino di siciliana!
05/05/2010 09:25
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Marco e Daiana, 5-5-2010 9:00:

è la stessa cosa che mi sta succedendo con un pulcino di siciliana!




Sì, egualmente altri selezionatori hanno avuti questo! Che cosa ha potuto essere la causa di?
Il pulcino è normalmente E/eb S/S*S/- Bl/bl+ , così il nero si è diluito al blu su di Argento. Ha potuto l'Argento sorpassare le piume completeamente??
[Modificato da Danny_57 05/05/2010 09:26]
05/05/2010 23:19
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 1.184
Registrato il: 26/10/2008
Città: ROMA
Età: 53
Sesso: Maschile
Utente Veteran
ciao danny ho postato alcune foto di moroseta c'e' un pulcino che e' quasi grigio perla nato dall'incrocio tra sparviero e nero e' forse un ritorno all'origine della sparviero il becco e la pelle sono chiari
un saluto emanuele
06/05/2010 07:50
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
emanuele-70, 5-5-2010 23:19:

ciao danny ho postato alcune foto di moroseta c'e' un pulcino che e' quasi grigio perla nato dall'incrocio tra sparviero e nero e' forse un ritorno all'origine della sparviero il becco e la pelle sono chiari
un saluto emanuele



Questo pulcino é nasce da Sparviero X Sparviero ma i genitori dove un trasportatore di un allel del "lav„. Il becco e la pelle sono scuro.
Allora questo pulcino é una grigioperlasparviero !!



[Modificato da Danny_57 06/05/2010 08:50]
06/05/2010 11:37
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 1.184
Registrato il: 26/10/2008
Città: ROMA
Età: 53
Sesso: Maschile
Utente Veteran
il mio e' tipo questo solo che ha mantenuto il becco chiaro e la pelle chiara
un saluto emanuele
06/05/2010 18:50
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
emanuele-70, 6-5-2010 11:37:

il mio e' tipo questo solo che ha mantenuto il becco chiaro e la pelle chiara
un saluto emanuele



ciò è un particolare della testa



13/05/2010 11:27
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Danny_57, 5-5-2010 8:18:

Questo pulcino era blu nato ed ora diventato completamente bianco !!!???






Può questo pulcino essere un albino recessivo?


13/05/2010 13:11
 
Quota
ciao danny!E' capitato anche a me anni fa, uno nato con piumino blu ha poi sviluppato penne bianche, anche all'allevatore da cui presi il ceppo capitava ogni tanto questa cosa ma non sapeva spiegarsela.
Credo che però l'albinismo non c'entri..il problema dell'albinismo l'avevo posto quando da esemplari blu o da esemplari grigioperla nascevano dei bianchi (già alla nascita bianchi) con cerchietto intorno all'occhio giallo e becco giallo.Oltre a qualche depigmentazione sui tarsi.
In questo caso il colore del piumino che poi cambia non credo abbia valenza essendo il piumino la plumula temporanea..is like that when a chick hatch orange and become white (genetically the white is not so clear but it doesn't mean that is of another colour)
13/05/2010 13:14
 
Quota
In every case the feather is not complete, probably at the adult age you will se other colour feather..wait some mounth
13/05/2010 13:24
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Rachele1, 13-5-2010 13:14:

In every case the feather is not complete, probably at the adult age you will se other colour feather..wait some mounth




Oké, I keep you informed how it evoluate in time .
Only for now it look strange the "white" it is more whiter than normal white!
13/05/2010 13:29
 
Quota
yes, it's true the white is really clear and even if adult the female and coq never will have yellow in neck..so candid
15/05/2010 10:20
 
Quota
hello,

I have the same thing last year, and it is white now... The mother black and the father is grigioperlo, pero in the grand parents of the father there was a white.
02/06/2010 23:08
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Rachele1, 13-5-2010 13:29:

yes, it's true the white is really clear and even if adult the female and coq never will have yellow in neck..so candid




The mistery about the Blue becoming white is solved.
As always we not must look to far .
The grandparents of this chick parents was a recessive white cock.
So both Blue parents where carriers of one "c" allel that came together in one of the chicks as "c/c". Recessive white is epistatic (kind of Dominant) over the groundcolor of the chick that was "E/E Bl/bl+ S/S"
By borning the fluff was just Blue, once the feathers came these where just recessive white. Nothing more, nothing less.
[Modificato da Danny_57 04/06/2010 09:52]
03/06/2010 09:35
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 5.201
Registrato il: 30/01/2008
Città: SINNAI
Età: 50
Sesso: Femminile
Utente Master
Danny but epistatic is not a kind of dominance. And this "c" is a recessive epistatic allele.
[Modificato da Tunde73 03/06/2010 09:37]
03/06/2010 10:04
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 9:35:

Danny but epistatic is not a kind of dominance. And this "c" is a recessive epistatic allele.



Oké, Tünde , my chosse of words is not always with the exact scientific definition but I only wanted to give a feeling.

So, Epistatic is a double mutant where one mutation masks the phenotype of another mutation. Epistasis is not the same thing as dominance. With epistasis a mutation in one gene masks the expression of a different gene. With dominance, one allele of a gene masks the expression of another allele of the same gene.

But I found this a too long explanation !!! ;-)
[Modificato da Danny_57 03/06/2010 10:14]
03/06/2010 10:25
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 5.201
Registrato il: 30/01/2008
Città: SINNAI
Età: 50
Sesso: Femminile
Utente Master
An epistatic gene supresses the effects of an other gene (situated or on the same chromosome but in a different locus or on an other chromosome) so the effect of this other gene (epistatic gene) is not modified but suppressed.
For me epistasis can be not confronted with dominance because when an allele is dominant, it is enough only one of this allele for have the same phenotype as in homozygosity and this not happens with a recessive epistatic gene.
03/06/2010 10:31
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 10:25:

An epistatic gene supresses the effects of an other gene (situated or on the same chromosome but in a different locus or on an other chromosome) so the effect of this other gene (epistatic gene) is not modified but suppressed.
For me epistasis can be not confronted with dominance because when an allele is dominant, it is enough only one of this allele for have the same phenotype as in homozygosity and this not happens with a recessive epistatic gene.




Oké, is what I wrote no? If not, sorry for the confusion [SM=g7364]
03/06/2010 10:40
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:

For me epistasis can be not confronted with dominance because when an allele is dominant, it is enough only one of this allele for have the same phenotype as in homozygosity and this not happens with a recessive epistatic gene.




I not agree with this !!!
Barred is Dominat when B/b+ should be the same as B/B !!!!!!!
Look the phenotypes in reality !!!
03/06/2010 11:24
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 5.201
Registrato il: 30/01/2008
Città: SINNAI
Età: 50
Sesso: Femminile
Utente Master
When it is like this we speak of incomplete dominance, you know it.
(When I responded, was written "modifies or suppresses", was the reason I reacted as I reacted.)
03/06/2010 12:06
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 11:24:

When it is like this we speak of incomplete dominance, you know it.
(When I responded, was written "modifies or suppresses", was the reason I reacted as I reacted.)




NO Barring is a Dominant gene, Blue is incomplete Dominant gene !!
03/06/2010 12:38
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 5.201
Registrato il: 30/01/2008
Città: SINNAI
Età: 50
Sesso: Femminile
Utente Master
For definition dominance is when the phenotype in homozygosity is the same as in heterozygosity. If it is enough that in both cases the phenotype is barred (in this case yes, B is dominant) or counts also the tonality (then B is not completly dominant).
03/06/2010 12:43
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 12:38:

For definition dominance is when the phenotype in homozygosity is the same as in heterozygosity. If it is enough that in both cases the phenotype is barred (in this case yes, B is dominant) or counts also the tonality (then B is not completly dominant).




Yes in this way I can agree. But there is a difference with the incomplete Dominant Blue gene, was what I wanted to indicate.
Because "Barring" is nominate as Dominate gene and "Blue" (which is also written with a capital is only an incomplete Dominat gene.
Both show different phenotypes when hetrozygote or homozygote (only not for the Barring because that is sexlinked so the hens look always as an heterozygote form but is called hemyzigote)

But when explaining always in the exact scientific way it gives more confucians (misunderstandings) than bring clearity for the common breeder who wants to understand the basic for can breed with the simple knowledge of genetic heriditance, no?

But in fact it is maybe better to not discus this theory because it never completed the reality!!!!
[Modificato da Danny_57 03/06/2010 13:37]
03/06/2010 16:40
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 5.201
Registrato il: 30/01/2008
Città: SINNAI
Età: 50
Sesso: Femminile
Utente Master
If scientific way or not, it is the same, important is to be clear for not create confusion.
03/06/2010 19:21
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 16:40:

If scientific way or not, it is the same, important is to be clear for not create confusion.




BASTA
03/06/2010 19:54
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 16:40:

If scientific way or not, it is the same, important is to be clear for not create confusion.




So, simpley said, you educated people please explain it in a way that we simple people can understand it, or is that too much asked !!??
Sorry for all well intended educated people but tell us what is really going about we should be helped much.
I intend come to our level!! nothing more nothing less.
[Modificato da Danny_57 03/06/2010 20:02]
03/06/2010 21:43
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 5.201
Registrato il: 30/01/2008
Città: SINNAI
Età: 50
Sesso: Femminile
Utente Master
Danny, also you wrote the things in a scientific way, you spook about epistasis. I only wanted correct that this recessive epistasis can be not paragoned with the dominance because we need 2 of that factor for have an effect as in the recessivity. For the rest i wrote in general, I never was contrary to explain in a not scientific way.
04/06/2010 09:37
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Re:
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 21:43:

Danny, also you wrote the things in a scientific way, you spook about epistasis. I only wanted correct that this recessive epistasis can be not paragoned with the dominance because we need 2 of that factor for have an effect as in the recessivity. For the rest i wrote in general, I never was contrary to explain in a not scientific way.




In my Silkie page : http://sites.google.com/site/zijdehoenders/t&dcreating/basics-about-chicken-color-genetics-heritage
I wrote for epistatic : "E" is a Dominant gene, "c" is a recessive gene but when the two "c" alleles comes together in one chick as "c/c" (homozygote recessieve white) it is EPISTASIS over the "E/E" (homozygote Dominant Black) and it will let see the recessive color white in the phenotype.
Epistasis: some genes (here c/c) overrule the effect of other genes (here E/E).

-This word "overrule" or "supression" one could simpely say that it "Dominate" an other.
-I NOT wrote "kind of Dominance" but I wrote "kind of Dominant" is a difference.
-In scientific signification it is incorrect but in reality it was what a breeder see.
-I not wanted to give a long scientific confusing explination.I only wanted to let see the things "simple" and understandable for everybody. If we could put or brains together for this instead of discussing over details we could all be happy and make also others happy, maybe.

I surely still want to try



Ciao Danny
[Modificato da Danny_57 04/06/2010 16:57]
05/06/2010 20:42
 
Quota
OFFLINE
oké, when the reached hand is not aceppted , I can not do more !!
07/06/2010 16:06
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 5.201
Registrato il: 30/01/2008
Città: SINNAI
Età: 50
Sesso: Femminile
Utente Master
How?
Amministra Discussione: | Chiudi | Sposta | Cancella | Modifica | Notifica email Pagina precedente | 1 2 | Pagina successiva
Crea nuova discussione
 | 
Rispondi a questa discussione
UNA COMMUNITY DI VERI APPASSIONATI AMATORIALI
Feed | Forum | Album | Utenti | Cerca | Login | Registrati | Amministra | Regolamento | Privacy
Tutti gli orari sono GMT+01:00. Adesso sono le 23:37. Versione: Stampabile | Mobile - © 2000-2024 www.freeforumzone.com