Marco e Daiana, 5-5-2010 9:00:è la stessa cosa che mi sta succedendo con un pulcino di siciliana!
emanuele-70, 5-5-2010 23:19:ciao danny ho postato alcune foto di moroseta c'e' un pulcino che e' quasi grigio perla nato dall'incrocio tra sparviero e nero e' forse un ritorno all'origine della sparviero il becco e la pelle sono chiari un saluto emanuele
emanuele-70, 6-5-2010 11:37:il mio e' tipo questo solo che ha mantenuto il becco chiaro e la pelle chiara un saluto emanuele
Danny_57, 5-5-2010 8:18:Questo pulcino era blu nato ed ora diventato completamente bianco !!!???
Rachele1, 13-5-2010 13:14:In every case the feather is not complete, probably at the adult age you will se other colour feather..wait some mounth
Rachele1, 13-5-2010 13:29:yes, it's true the white is really clear and even if adult the female and coq never will have yellow in neck..so candid
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 9:35:Danny but epistatic is not a kind of dominance. And this "c" is a recessive epistatic allele.
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 10:25:An epistatic gene supresses the effects of an other gene (situated or on the same chromosome but in a different locus or on an other chromosome) so the effect of this other gene (epistatic gene) is not modified but suppressed. For me epistasis can be not confronted with dominance because when an allele is dominant, it is enough only one of this allele for have the same phenotype as in homozygosity and this not happens with a recessive epistatic gene.
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 11:24:When it is like this we speak of incomplete dominance, you know it. (When I responded, was written "modifies or suppresses", was the reason I reacted as I reacted.)
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 12:38:For definition dominance is when the phenotype in homozygosity is the same as in heterozygosity. If it is enough that in both cases the phenotype is barred (in this case yes, B is dominant) or counts also the tonality (then B is not completly dominant).
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 16:40:If scientific way or not, it is the same, important is to be clear for not create confusion.
Tunde73, 3-6-2010 21:43:Danny, also you wrote the things in a scientific way, you spook about epistasis. I only wanted correct that this recessive epistasis can be not paragoned with the dominance because we need 2 of that factor for have an effect as in the recessivity. For the rest i wrote in general, I never was contrary to explain in a not scientific way.